[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: performance libssh vs. openssh (was: scp vs. sftp)


 Hi,

You can start on optimization of memory allocation functions.
This can be and mostly the root cause of such libraries.

2009/10/20 Vic Lee <llyzs@xxxxxxx>

> Hi,
>
> Do you already have some analysis on this situation already?
>
> I think the performance also affects the tunneling, which is the
> essential feature I am using. I want to help on this but I don't know
> where I should start yet.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vic
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 18:17 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I've tested sftp from openssh against libssh.
> >
> > openssh: ~8 MB/s
> > libssh: ~2 MB/s
> >
> > We have a serious problem ...
> >
> >
> >
> >       -- andreas
>
>
>
>


-- 
Mikhail

Follow-Ups:
Re: performance libssh vs. opensshAris Adamantiadis <aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
performance libssh vs. openssh (was: scp vs. sftp)Vic Lee <llyzs@xxxxxxx>
Archive administrator: postmaster@lists.cynapses.org