[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[0.5] Threads?
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: [0.5] Threads?
- From: <prez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 16:21:21 -0400
- To: <libssh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Aris, I noticed you putting in threading logic for 0.5. Can you tell me what the reason for this is? I'm wary of having threads integrated with libssh, and so far I cannot find much reason for it. Given that everything uses handles, all data for a session (be it a ssh session or crypto session) should be contained within that handle, nothing should be global or function-level static. If this is the case, then there should be no need for mutexes, regardless of how many ssh sessions there are. Theoretically I should be able to run any number of ssh sessions from a single thread, in which case locking is unnecessary. The only situation I can think of requiring locks like this is the situation of: Thread A receives data from transport and invokes libssh to 'notify' the data has arrived and what it is. Thread B needs to invoke a callback (for whatever reason) on the same session. But this can still be handled without needing to implement threading directly into libssh. PreZ
Re: [0.5] Threads? | Aris Adamantiadis <aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |