[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ssh_connect blocking vs. non-blocking?


Hi,

By default sessions are blocking. We have made a lot of progress in
non-blocking connections and it's believed to work.
However blocking doesn't mean 100% cpu. Could you provide a backtrace ?
Also, which version of libssh are you using ?

Thanks,

Aris

Le 14/11/12 19:09, Jonathan Walker a écrit :
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> I noticed the following note under the doc describing the function
> */ssh_set_blocking/*
> 
>  
> 
> *Bug: <http://api.libssh.org/stable/bug.html#_bug000003>*
> 
> nonblocking code is in development and won't work as expected
> 
>  
> 
> Are SSH sessions by default  in blocking or non-blocking mode?  I notice
> in rare cases that the */ssh_connect/* function is getting stuck and
> taking up 100% CPU on my system.  I was wondering if the above note may
> have anything to do with this?  Presumably blocking mode should not mean
> that the function gets stuck in a loop?  I’ll try to capture logs, but
> the issue is not reproducible with a known set of steps.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are ShoreTel property, are
> confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named
> recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message
> immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited

Follow-Ups:
RE: ssh_connect blocking vs. non-blocking?Jonathan Walker <jwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:
ssh_connect blocking vs. non-blocking?Jonathan Walker <jwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archive administrator: postmaster@lists.cynapses.org