[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sessionIsServerKnow function
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: sessionIsServerKnow function
- From: Bruno Buzzi Brassesco <bruno.brasesco@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:25:20 -0300
- To: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
Hi, (Accidentally send a partial mail) Thanks to the community for all the answers I get is very helpful. Just a little context: I'm writing a wrapper around libssh for Smalltalk language (more specific for GemStone/S Smalltalk). My knowledge of C is very limited compared to your knowledge so maybe in some questions I can ask some nonsense :) So far I connected to the server now implementing authentication. The server is 'localhost' but when calling "ssh_session_is_known_server()" it answers 2 (SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS_CHANGED). Checking the code: /** * The server key has changed. Either you are under attack or the * administrator changed the key. You HAVE to warn the user about a * possible attack. */ Is this normal for 'localhost' ? Or it should answer 1 (SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS_OK) ? If it should answer 1 then what can be the situation for 2 result with localhost ? thank you for your patience... regards, bruno El jue., 2 jul. 2020 a las 11:21, Bruno Buzzi Brassesco (< bruno.brasesco@xxxxxxxxx>) escribió: > Hi, > Thanks to the community for all the answers I get is very helpful. > Just a little context: > I'm writing a wrapper around libssh for Smalltalk language (more specific > for GemStone/S Smalltalk). > My knowledge of C is very limited compared to your knowledge so maybe in > some questions I can ask some nonsense :) > > So far I connected to the server now implementing authentication. > The server is 'localhost' but when calling "ssh_session_is_known_server()" > it answer 2 (SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS_CHANGED). > Checking the code: >
Re: sessionIsServerKnow function | Jakub Jelen <jjelen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
sessionIsServerKnow function | Bruno Buzzi Brassesco <bruno.brasesco@xxxxxxxxx> |