Re: [Libssh] [PATCH 1/2] Add a generic way to handle sockets asynchronously.

[Aleksandar Kanchev <aleksandar.kanchev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I didn't even notice any long lines, but I'm also using thunderbird.

Btw I forgot to ask about what you mean with libgnet? Do you mean the 
deprecated GNetLibrary <http://live.gnome.org/GNetLibrary>? Or the new 
GIO <http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/ch01.html>? It's mostly 
designed for file systems (VFS). Libssh could be build on top of just 
glib (no gio or gobject) and bindings could be created for gio and 
gobject to get VFS and language bindings support.

best regards,
Aleks


On 07/02/2009 10:50 PM, Aris Adamantiadis wrote:
> Excuse me for the long lines, I still don't understand why thundirbird 
> doesn't always split the long lines in my emails.
>
> Aris
>
> Aris Adamantiadis a écrit :
> > Aleksandar,
> >
> > I will lie if I never though of that possibility. I have even though 
> > of rewriting libssh in C++ using a decent OOP model.
> >
> > But there is the problem of dependancies which unfortunately are 
> > really a problem for a small project like libssh. If we play well, 
> > libssh could be integrated in major IO toolkits like glibnet, QT, 
> > apache IO library, others, ...
> <snip>