[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libssh as static lib
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: libssh as static lib
- From: Aris Adamantiadis <aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:49:51 +0200
- To: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
Hi, see inline Andreas Schneider a écrit :
yes, it is. This is the static libary. You know that if you link your code statically with libssh you have to release *your* work under LGPL too.You don't have to do this if you link dynamically. See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html
A little clarification. It only matters if you *release* your stuff. If you do, you either have to release under a LGPL 2.1 compatible licence (GPL, LGPL, BSD, Apache, ...) or provide your binaries compiled against a dynamically linked libssh.
It's ok to provide a static version as long as you release the dynamic version together.
Andreas, I was looking in a way to staticaly compile libssh under linux, but did not find the good cmake commandline. Any idea ?
Thanks, Aris
Re: libssh as static lib | Andreas Schneider <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
libssh as static lib | Rami Fernandes <ramif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: libssh as static lib | Andreas Schneider <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |