[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libssh sftp download performance
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: libssh sftp download performance
- From: Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 08:21:44 +0100
- To: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
On Friday, December 03, 2010 19:52:19 you wrote: > Greetings. > Hi Mark, > I've been playing with libssh and liking it, except that I've > noticed that its download performance is poor. I had been > using 0.4.6, but today I got the latest source from the git > repository. I was surprised to see that the performance is > now repeatably half of the 0.4.6 performance, which wasn't > too good to start with. did you use the master branch? The master branch is under heavy development. We changed a lot of stuff, but you're right we need to fix this problem. > I put together a chart comparing various sftp clients and put it here: > > http://60bits.net/sni/libssh2-perf.htm > > As you can see, the download performance of 0.4.6 is about half > that of other sftp implementations. You know that sftp_read is a blocking implementation an there is a sftp_async_read? http://api.libssh.org/master/group__libssh__sftp.html#ga4399c7ccd8b39a460265047f9d7bc9b1 > I've searched the mailing list archive and haven't come across > any mentions of performance lately. > Does anyone have any ideas as to how download performance could > be increased to make libssh competitive to other SSH implementations? We made libssh in master async but not the channel functions yet. > Thanks. > > Mark R Cheers, -- andreas
RE: libssh sftp download performance | "Mark Riordan" <mriordan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Querying session parameters | Pierre Lewis <leware@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
RE: libssh sftp download performance | "Mark Riordan" <mriordan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
libssh sftp download performance | "Mark Riordan" <mriordan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |