[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multithreading for a single session
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: multithreading for a single session
- From: "Jeetu Golani" <jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:27:22 +0000
- To: "Gearoid Murphy" <gearoid.murphy@xxxxxx> , "libssh@xxxxxxxxxx" <libssh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: "Aris Adamantiadis" <aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Gearoid, Thank you so much for sending me this code. I'm currently out on holiday but will look at it as I hit back home. I suspect I'll have a few questions for you then :) thank you again :) Bye for now -- Sent from my Nokia N900 using Nokia Messaging ----- Original message ----- > > As it happens, you're in luck, I implemented a prototype of the libssh > boost driver to verify that the concept works, attached. > > That code will compile happily on Xubuntu 11.10, it's C++ and Boost > linking to libssh and libssl. > > On 14/03/12 19:37, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Thank you so much for taking the time to respond :) truly appreciate > > it :) > > > > > > > > > I seem to recall somebody telling me that the if you are > > > > > > > going to use threads, then you must use a separate session > > > > > > > for each thread. The application that used libssh that I > > > > > > > wrote and used to maintain had a separate session for each > > > > > > > thread and it worked well. > > Eddy, yes my server code worked really well after I followed Aris's > > suggestions and the changes he made. So long as a single session is > > working with a single thread you can have multiple such sessions to > > handle different connections and it all works great. > > > > Unfortunately the trouble came to surface when I tried forwarding X > > clients more complex than xeyes et al. That's when I realized these > > clients were opening multiple channels over the same session. > > > > > > > > My favored solution these days is to use a boost io_service to > > > > > > peek at the session socket, whenever data needs to be > > > > > > processed, an asynchronous handler is invoked which processes > > > > > > the active channels. > > Gearoid, I've been thinking along the same lines and if there is a way > > to refactor my code to be able to handle multiple channels over a > > single session without the need for multithreading it. Your solution > > in principle sounds like what would be great, though I'm not sure I > > understand how I could go about doing this, is it possible for me to > > see any code displaying this? Would truly appreciate it :) > > > > Thanks yet again guys for coming to my rescue (and that of my project > > :) ). > > > > Regards, > > Jeetu > > ebrain.in | Beehive Computing > > Share your software and computing resources - discover and run > > software from any device around you. > > > > > > > > On 3/14/12, Eddy Valdes<evaldes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Agreed. > > > > > > On 03/14/2012 10:47 AM, Gearoid Murphy wrote: > > > > My personal feeling would be to remain single-threaded. Writing > > > > asynchronous single-threaded code is initially more challenging > > > > than writing synchronous multi-threaded code but when problems > > > > occur, the single-threaded context is much easier to diagnose. > > > > > > > > On 14/03/12 14:36, Aris Adamantiadis wrote: > > > > > Do you guys think we should include inside libssh a support for > > > > > multi-threaded single sessions ? I see a possibility but I also > > > > > see many things that can go wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Aris > > > > > > > > > > Le 14/03/12 14:58, Gearoid Murphy a écrit : > > > > > > It is possible to use a single session in a multi-threaded > > > > > > context as long as you protect access to the session (and > > > > > > associated channels) using a session mutex. It's very > > > > > > inefficient however, as every channel read operation must > > > > > > timeout in order to release the mutex when the associated > > > > > > channel is inactive so other channels can be processed. This > > > > > > timeout is the source of the performance penalty, it decimates > > > > > > bandwidth. I've seen single threaded applications capable of > > > > > > 30-40 mbs being reduced to 256kps using the multi-threaded > > > > > > approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > My favored solution these days is to use a boost io_service to > > > > > > peek at the session socket, whenever data needs to be > > > > > > processed, an asynchronous handler is invoked which processes > > > > > > the active channels. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 14/03/12 13:38, Eddy Valdes wrote: > > > > > > > Jeetu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I seem to recall somebody telling me that the if you are > > > > > > > going to use threads, then you must use a separate session > > > > > > > for each thread. The application that used libssh that I > > > > > > > wrote and used to maintain had a separate session for each > > > > > > > thread and it worked well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eddy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/14/2012 09:31 AM, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just wanted to know if anyone has had a chance to look > > > > > > > > into the possibility of multithreading over a single > > > > > > > > session which I had discussed in any earlier mail here > > > > > > > > (pasted below). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now for my open source eBrainPool (ebrain.in) project > > > > > > > > I have gone ahead with piped openssh server and daemon > > > > > > > > however this is not ideal for variety of reasons. I would > > > > > > > > love to use libssh however the issues I highlighted > > > > > > > > earlier prevent me from doing that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know how I can help with this :)....thanks > > > > > > > > again for all > > > > > > > > the help everyone here has provided me with in the past :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Jeetu > > > > > > > > ebrain.in | Beehive Computing > > > > > > > > Share your software and computing resources - discover and > > > > > > > > run software from any device around you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > <jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > oops forgot to mention the git link where this code can > > > > > > > > > be seen ;)....git://ebrain.in:/libssh-server.git :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sorry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:59 PM, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > <jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been continuing work with my libssh server based > > > > > > > > > > on suggestions you > > > > > > > > > > had made with regards multithreading when we were > > > > > > > > > > debugging issues where I > > > > > > > > > > was seeing bad packet length, HMAC errors et al. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I refactored my code as you had suggested (below) such > > > > > > > > > > that there would be > > > > > > > > > > only one thread per session, although there could be > > > > > > > > > > multiple connects i.e. > > > > > > > > > > sessions. This worked fantastic for me and I was able > > > > > > > > > > to solve the packet > > > > > > > > > > corruption issues caused due to a race condition with > > > > > > > > > > multiple ssh loops > > > > > > > > > > running. I could therefore have different ssh clients > > > > > > > > > > connect to the same > > > > > > > > > > instance of the server and X forward simple x clients > > > > > > > > > > like xcalc, xclock, > > > > > > > > > > xeyes, xgc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately as soon as I tried to forward more > > > > > > > > > > complex applications such > > > > > > > > > > as libreoffice, chromium etc things weren't working. > > > > > > > > > > Further analysis and a > > > > > > > > > > look at the openssh code showed that these > > > > > > > > > > applications spawn multiple > > > > > > > > > > connects to the same $DISPLAY. Therefore as I > > > > > > > > > > understand it (could be wrong) > > > > > > > > > > the server needs to accept and process different event > > > > > > > > > > connections on the > > > > > > > > > > same session. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have refactored the code again to account for this > > > > > > > > > > but basically this > > > > > > > > > > reintroduces the same race condition with multiple > > > > > > > > > > event handling we had > > > > > > > > > > seen earlier and while programs like libreoffice, > > > > > > > > > > chromium etc more further > > > > > > > > > > along they eventually crash due to bad packet length, > > > > > > > > > > mac errors,etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried to protect the event handling function > > > > > > > > > > ssh_event_dopoll with a > > > > > > > > > > mutex hoping this will resolve the issue, however it > > > > > > > > > > didn't make any > > > > > > > > > > difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm at my wits end here and could appreciate advice > > > > > > > > > > here. One obvious way > > > > > > > > > > is for me to somehow refactor my code in a way that > > > > > > > > > > eludes me at the moment > > > > > > > > > > to get around this issue. The other could be if libssh > > > > > > > > > > itself would handle > > > > > > > > > > multithreaded event handling for the same session > > > > > > > > > > differently or if I am > > > > > > > > > > somehow using it in a wrong way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have created a git repo of my code so anyone can > > > > > > > > > > study it. I have not > > > > > > > > > > yet put a GPL license header to the code (just > > > > > > > > > > realized that ;) ) however I > > > > > > > > > > don't care and in fact would be honoured if people > > > > > > > > > > would find some use for > > > > > > > > > > this code. The code will eventually be part of the > > > > > > > > > > eBrainPool (ebrain.in) > > > > > > > > > > project which I am working on which itself is GPLv3 - > > > > > > > > > > so feel free to use it > > > > > > > > > > in any way you want. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now I could really use some ideas on how I could > > > > > > > > > > either refactor my > > > > > > > > > > code to avoid the above issues or somehow if libssh > > > > > > > > > > could be modified to > > > > > > > > > > handle multithreading for the same session differently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye for now > > > > > > > > > > Jeetu > > > > > > > > > > ebrain.in | Beehive Computing > > > > > > > > > > Share your software and computing resources - discover > > > > > > > > > > and run software > > > > > > > > > > from any device around you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:42 PM, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > <jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > took me a lot of time and head scratching, but I > > > > > > > > > > > > narrowed it down to a > > > > > > > > > > > > threading problem. Two of your threads are running > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh loops at the > > > > > > > > > > > > same > > > > > > > > > > > I can completely appreciate the effort you must have > > > > > > > > > > > gone through to > > > > > > > > > > > debug this :)...threading issues can be pesky and > > > > > > > > > > > since I didn't understand the internals of libssh it > > > > > > > > > > > was proving quite difficult for > > > > > > > > > > > me to trace this out.....thank you so much Aris :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hacked your example so the server_thread() > > > > > > > > > > > > functions leaves early. It > > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't remove the race but reduces its window. > > > > > > > > > > > > now it works for me, > > > > > > > > > > > > and I'm > > > > > > > > > > > > able to run an xterm with it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I strongly recommend that you refactor your code > > > > > > > > > > > > in a singlethread > > > > > > > > > > > > design, > > > > > > > > > > > > and that you move the x11 callbacks back in the > > > > > > > > > > > > server loop. > > > > > > > > > > > I just did a cursory test of your code and it > > > > > > > > > > > definitely runs much better from what I could see > > > > > > > > > > > :)....I will take your advice to heed and > > > > > > > > > > > try to refactor the code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's discuss what libssh can do better to help > > > > > > > > > > > > you write better code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a little concerned, I would ultimately need to > > > > > > > > > > > handle multiple sessions.....the code you saw dealt > > > > > > > > > > > with a single session....do you > > > > > > > > > > > think this would also trigger similar issues?....what > > > > > > > > > > > precautions do > > > > > > > > > > > you think I need to keep in mind while I attempt > > > > > > > > > > > this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks so much Aris, I'm sooooooo glad to finally > > > > > > > > > > > have the answer to > > > > > > > > > > > my question and know that this was a problem in my > > > > > > > > > > > code....now I can > > > > > > > > > > > dedicate my energies in this direction :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye for now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Aris > > > > > > > > > > > Adamantiadis<aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jeetu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > took me a lot of time and head scratching, but I > > > > > > > > > > > > narrowed it down to a > > > > > > > > > > > > threading problem. Two of your threads are running > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh loops at the > > > > > > > > > > > > same > > > > > > > > > > > > time, and this cause races. The probability that > > > > > > > > > > > > the race causes problem can > > > > > > > > > > > > be high, because there's a trigger (data on > > > > > > > > > > > > socket) and both threads > > > > > > > > > > > > run > > > > > > > > > > > > almost the same code at the same time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thread 1: message = ssh_message_get(session); > > > > > > > > > > > > in server_thread() > > > > > > > > > > > > Thread 2: ssh_event_dopoll(event, > > > > > > > > > > > > 1000); in wait_for_something() > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hacked your example so the server_thread() > > > > > > > > > > > > functions leaves early. It > > > > > > > > > > > > doesn't remove the race but reduces its window. > > > > > > > > > > > > now it works for me, > > > > > > > > > > > > and I'm > > > > > > > > > > > > able to run an xterm with it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I strongly recommend that you refactor your code > > > > > > > > > > > > in a singlethread > > > > > > > > > > > > design, > > > > > > > > > > > > and that you move the x11 callbacks back in the > > > > > > > > > > > > server loop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's discuss what libssh can do better to help > > > > > > > > > > > > you write better code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kr, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 09/11/11 12:38, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No probs and I completely understand and > > > > > > > > > > > > > appreciate your interest in > > > > > > > > > > > > > looking into this....please let me know how I > > > > > > > > > > > > > can help further :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye for now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adamantiadis<aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jeetu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I apologize, still had no time to check it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm pretty busy and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > free time is swallowed by another project. I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hope I can free myself > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hour or two next week to debug this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kr, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 3/11/11 19:13, jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just wanted to check in if you've had a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chance to try out the libssh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server code I've sent and reproduce the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > errors I've been seeing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks so much again for looking into this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye for now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 2:20 PM, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm attaching my proof of concept server > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code as.....ebpsshd-singlesession.c has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > compile instructions at the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > beginning of the code. You will also need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to generate a key.h file > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that holds the public key of the user who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be connecting to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > server - this is tempoarary since as of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now I'm not reading this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > info > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from an authorized_keys or something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > similar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just create a key.h file in the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > directory and put something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define MY_PUB_KEY "[YOUR PUBLIC KEY > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WITHIN THESE QUOTES]" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also as of now ebpsshd-singlesession > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > listens in on port 2000. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ssh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should connect to that port. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also have a libssh-project-wrapper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > script that allows me to try > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out without needing to install the libssh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i've built. It basically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the content: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > export > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/jeetu/utils/libssh/libssh-project/build/src:/home/jeetu/utils/libssh/libssh-project/build/src/threads > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ./$1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been testing this code with simple > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > examples like xeyes and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xcalc. For some reason xcalc shows the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem much sooner than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xeyes, maybe because of the volume of data > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being transmitted to and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fro? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is proof of concept code with a lot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of fiddling with buffer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sizes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as I have been trying to study if any of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that makes an impact however > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please point out any way you think this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can be improved on :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sorry to drop this in your lap > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > especially if it turns out it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some server side code issue, however I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > completely appreciate your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > help > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on this. I would like to squash this bug > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regardless of where it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i.e. in my code or libssh, unfortunately > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my understanding of libssh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the ssh protocol is a little limited. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However I do not want to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all of this load completely in your lap > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and if you share your thoughts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and there's something you would like me to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look into then please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > let > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeetu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ebrain.in | Beehive Computing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Discover and run software from any device > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > around you - an open > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (GPL) project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:22 PM, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I'll need a proof-of-concept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code to debug this. Would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sharing your code, or it's not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible (too much integration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > existing code). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No problem at all :) The code is an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > independent unit as of now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wanted to make it work before I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > integrate it within my open source > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > project (eBrainPool) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll mail this out to you tomm (not on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the machine with the code > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now :) ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks so much for looking into > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this.....truly appreciate it :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye for now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adamantiadis<aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jeetu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By seeing your logs, I understand this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both side have a hmac error. The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > openssh client sees it first, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sends > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > disconnect (that works), then there's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the error in the libssh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > log. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I'll need a proof-of-concept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > code to debug this. Would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sharing your code, or it's not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible (too much integration > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > existing code). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, do you think I can reproduce > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the problem by "fixing" samplesshd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make new X11 channels connection > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > connect to the local X11 unix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > socket ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 18/10/11 20:34, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not a problem and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shouldn't cause invalid MAC errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travel so I'll look at the log > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when i'm back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks so much Aris :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adamantiadis<aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not a problem and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shouldn't cause invalid MAC errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > travel so I'll look at the log > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when i'm back. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 18/10/11 12:30, u@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > debug3: Incorrect RSA1 identifier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > debug3: Could not load > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "/home/jeetu/.ssh/id_rsa" as a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RSA1 public > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > key > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > debug2: key_type_from_name: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unknown key type '-----BEGIN' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 03:22:08PM +0500, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jeetu.golani@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Aris, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've attached a log of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > libssh server > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (log-1-ebpsshd-singlesession-18102011.txt) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and the OpenSSH client > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (log-ssh-1-18102011.txt). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Kuttler ==*== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nc.netbeisser.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Eddy Valdes > > > Project Manager > > > Atronix Engineering > > > evaldes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > 770-840-4045 x235 > > > > > > > > > > > >
Attachment:
libssh.tar.bz2
Description: Tag-6caee760-c8cf-4be5-95b6-7646798f4f99
Archive administrator: postmaster@lists.cynapses.org