[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: State of X.509 support?
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: State of X.509 support?
- From: Karl Scott <karlscottbg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 13:03:51 -0700
- To: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
Thanks very much for the lightning fast response, Aris! This is good to know. -Karl On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Aris Adamantiadis <aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Karl, > > As far as I know, we never saw that x509 code. It was not contributed, > probably because of lack of time and follow-up from both parties. > > However the demand for X.509 is very low, I'm unsure if we should merge > that code at all. > > Aris > > On 2/08/17 21:57, Karl Scott wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > I noticed that the "cmake/Modules/FindGSSAPI.cmake" file in the libssh > > code base mentions hx509, which is Heimdal x509, but I wasn't able to > > find any references to X.509 anywhere else in the code (I was thinking > > that I should be able to find something in one of the C files, if it > > is supported, right?). > > > > I see that someone wanted to add X.509 support, and even wanted to add > > an example with it, here: > > https://www.libssh.org/archive/libssh/2012-03/0000006.html > > > > I am unable to locate this code though -- perhaps it was never added? > > Any pointers or places to start looking would be extremely welcome! > > > > Thank you very much, > > > > Karl > > > >
State of X.509 support? | Karl Scott <karlscottbg@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: State of X.509 support? | Aris Adamantiadis <aris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |