[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Support for SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST that is unknown
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Support for SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST that is unknown
- From: Mikael Petterson <mikael.petterson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:39:35 +0000
- To: "libssh@xxxxxxxxxx" <libssh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi again, Thanks Jakub for your reply. I need to make some corrections in this message. We are using libnetconf2 that uses libssh. The trilead ssh2 java client we use has a ping method that uses this: public byte[] getPayload() { if (payload == null) { TypesWriter tw = new TypesWriter(); tw.writeByte(Packets.SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST); tw.writeUINT32(recipientChannelID); tw.writeString("trilead-ping"); tw.writeBoolean(true); payload = tw.getBytes(); } return payload; } } So I need to correct myself. It is a SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST that is sent as ping and nothing else. I checked the logs when enabling ssh logging. 2024-09-02 11:46:31,297 (Slf4jLogConsumer.java:73) INFO : STDERR: [INF]: LN: Session 2: Received an SSH message "request-channel" of subtype "unknown". 2024-09-02 11:46:31,297 (Slf4jLogConsumer.java:73) INFO : STDERR: [2024/09/02 09:46:31.284447, 3] ssh_message_reply_default: Don't know what to default reply to 67108912 type I assume ssh_message_reply_default() is part of libssh. I checked the RFC https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4254.html#section-5 5.4<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4254.html#section-5.4>. Channel-Specific Requests Many 'channel type' values have extensions that are specific to that particular 'channel type'. An example is requesting a pty (pseudo terminal) for an interactive session. All channel-specific requests use the following format. byte SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST uint32 recipient channel string request type in US-ASCII characters only boolean want reply .... type-specific data follows Ylonen & Lonvick Standards Track [Page 9] ________________________________ RFC 4254<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4254> SSH Connection Protocol January 2006 If 'want reply' is FALSE, no response will be sent to the request. Otherwise, the recipient responds with either SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS, SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE, or request-specific continuation messages. If the request is not recognized or is not supported for the channel, SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE is returned. This message does not consume window space and can be sent even if no window space is available. The values of 'request type' are local to each channel type. The client is allowed to send further messages without waiting for the response to the request. 'request type' names follow the DNS extensibility naming convention outlined in [SSH-ARCH<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4254.html#ref-SSH-ARCH>] and [SSH-NUMBERS<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4254.html#ref-SSH-NUMBERS>]. byte SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS uint32 recipient channel byte SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE uint32 recipient channel These messages do not consume window space and can be sent even if no window space is available. So we should at least expect a SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE. I checked: https://github.com/libssh/libssh-mirror/blob/master/src/messages.c#L175 But could not see any support for unknown. Maybe I am looking in the wrong place. Br. //mike
Re: Support for SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST that is unknown | Jakub Jelen <jjelen@xxxxxxxxxx> |