[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help with OpenSSH Keep Alive
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Help with OpenSSH Keep Alive
- From: g4-lisz@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:50:25 +0200
- To: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx
Hi Rob, In my case there was no need to implement a callback on my own to handle these global keep-alive messages. As I wrote in my earlier message: As long as you see the lines you posted, all is fine: even when the lib doesn't know the request type, it sends a message back ("type unknown") to the server, which is enough to keep the connection alive. My actual problem was this: While the main loop was polling on the local listening socket, the lib's default handlers were not called. Here is the relevant part of my main loop: event = ssh_event_new(); ssh_event_add_session(event, session); bind(listensock, ...); while(1) { while (1) { channels[0]=NULL; // set the first channel we want to read from channels[1]=NULL; FD_ZERO(&fds); FD_SET(listensock, &fds); max_fd = listensock + 1; tv.tv_sec = 0; tv.tv_usec = 100000; sout_len = 0; rc = select(max_fd, &fds, NULL, NULL, &tv); if (-1 == rc && EINTR == errno) continue; else if (rc > 0) { if (FD_ISSET(listensock, &fds)) { printf("FD_ISSET\n"); forwardsock = accept(listensock, NULL, &sout_len); if (forwardsock < 0) { perror("accept failed"); goto shutdown; } else { printf("Local client connected.\n"); break; } } } else if (0 > rc) { perror("waiting on listening socket"); goto shutdown; } ssh_event_dopoll(event, 10); } channel = ssh_channel_new(session); ssh_channel_open_forward(channel, ...); while (1) { /* read/write from/to socket/channel */ } } What I was missing in the beginning was call of ssh_event_add_session(event, session) and later in the polling loop: ssh_event_dopoll(event, 10); I hope this helps! Till On 25.04.2018 14:25, Duff, Rob (Nokia - US/Plano) wrote: > The discussion thread sounds like it is what I need. > > I saw that g4-lisz was able to solve it by adding the session to the event. Could you post the pseudo code example with this change in place? > > Thanks so much! > Rob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Schneider [mailto:asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 12:41 AM > To: libssh@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Help with OpenSSH Keep Alive > > On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 23:25:06 CEST Duff, Rob (Nokia - US/Plano) wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am writing a client app which connects to an OpenSSH server, and >> opens a forwarding tunnel, then waits for another application to send >> requests, forwards those to the tunnel, and returns responses. >> Apparently, the server is sending global keep alive messages, and the >> my client is not responding to them. >> >> [2018/04/24 16:06:34.843907, 2] ssh_packet_global_request: Received >> SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST packet [2018/04/24 16:06:34.843907, 2] >> ssh_packet_global_request: UNKNOWN SSH_MSG_GLOBAL_REQUEST >> keepalive@xxxxxxxxxxx 1 [2018/04/24 16:06:34.844907, 1] ssh_packet_process: >> Couldn't do anything with packet type 80 >> >> Is there any sample/example code for both registering a callback to >> handle these keepalives, and also using the polling context mechanism? > We just had this question a few days ago (April 9th). > > https://www.libssh.org/archive/libssh/2018-04/0000001.html > > > I'm still hoping someone will improve the docs :-) (hint) > > > Andreas >
Help with OpenSSH Keep Alive | "Duff, Rob (Nokia - US/Plano)" <rob.duff@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: Help with OpenSSH Keep Alive | Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
RE: Help with OpenSSH Keep Alive | "Duff, Rob (Nokia - US/Plano)" <rob.duff@xxxxxxxxx> |